<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: -al</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wellspringsg.org/blogs/gospelprism/2008/02/15/al/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wellspringsg.org/blogs/gospelprism/2008/02/15/al/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Park</title>
		<link>http://www.wellspringsg.org/blogs/gospelprism/2008/02/15/al/comment-page-1/#comment-51256</link>
		<dc:creator>David Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2008/02/15/al/#comment-51256</guid>
		<description>Interesting points...but fairly scathing I think, without a fair shake at either definition. While you are right to point out the &quot;cheaper&quot; manifestations of these notions, there are deeper and constructive expressions as well. While language isn&#039;t all, it is a subtle move to make the noun form move from a static noun to something that expresses movement. In that sense, I think it helps, and in agreement with you, I think such movement has to be informed by the deeper doctrinal foundations that you speak of, but it&#039;s not to tear the word sans -al down, it&#039;s actually an aide to help us stop thinking of those notions as a one-time event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points&#8230;but fairly scathing I think, without a fair shake at either definition. While you are right to point out the &#8220;cheaper&#8221; manifestations of these notions, there are deeper and constructive expressions as well. While language isn&#8217;t all, it is a subtle move to make the noun form move from a static noun to something that expresses movement. In that sense, I think it helps, and in agreement with you, I think such movement has to be informed by the deeper doctrinal foundations that you speak of, but it&#8217;s not to tear the word sans -al down, it&#8217;s actually an aide to help us stop thinking of those notions as a one-time event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: every square inch</title>
		<link>http://www.wellspringsg.org/blogs/gospelprism/2008/02/15/al/comment-page-1/#comment-51241</link>
		<dc:creator>every square inch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2008/02/15/al/#comment-51241</guid>
		<description>Sam

Insightful post.  In a rush to be incarnational, I wonder if we haven&#039;t bypassed the glory of the Incarnation.  Beholding the Incarnation not simply as a metaphor for contextualizing but rather as the mystery of the glory of Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam</p>
<p>Insightful post.  In a rush to be incarnational, I wonder if we haven&#8217;t bypassed the glory of the Incarnation.  Beholding the Incarnation not simply as a metaphor for contextualizing but rather as the mystery of the glory of Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad brisco</title>
		<link>http://www.wellspringsg.org/blogs/gospelprism/2008/02/15/al/comment-page-1/#comment-51237</link>
		<dc:creator>brad brisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wccc.net/blogs/gospelprism/2008/02/15/al/#comment-51237</guid>
		<description>Darrell Guder has a good little book titled &quot;The Incarnation and the Church&#039;s Witness&quot; where he discusses the use of the word &quot;incarnational&quot; to describe our witness while not diluting THE incarnation event. I have posted a handful of excerpts inlcuding this one: 

http://missionalchurchnetwork.com/darrell-guder-incarnational-mission/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darrell Guder has a good little book titled &#8220;The Incarnation and the Church&#8217;s Witness&#8221; where he discusses the use of the word &#8220;incarnational&#8221; to describe our witness while not diluting THE incarnation event. I have posted a handful of excerpts inlcuding this one: </p>
<p><a href="http://missionalchurchnetwork.com/darrell-guder-incarnational-mission/" rel="nofollow">http://missionalchurchnetwork.com/darrell-guder-incarnational-mission/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

